- VOLUME
- Vol. 16 | (2)
- DOWNLOAD PDF
-
6. Seeking the Meaning of quality education.pdf
- TITLE
- Seeking the meaning of quality education: Paradigm changes from the 1960s to the 2010s
- KEYWORDS
- Quality education, postcolonial approach, input-output approach, human rights approach, social justice approach
DOI: 10.22804/kjep.2020.16.2.006
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits non-commercial use and distribution of the work, provided that the original work is properly cited and no modifications or derivative works are made.
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
ⓒKorean Educational Development Institute (KEDI)
Abstract
While quality education has regained global attention since the World Education Forum 2015, there is rare agreement on the term “quality education” within the international community, as well as in academia. This study aims to review articles on quality education published in selected academic journals between the 1960s and the 2010s to find a pattern of change in how quality education is defined. Inspired by Tikly and Barrett (2011) and Tikly (2011), this study applies four main discourses ― postcolonial, input-output, human rights and social justice ― to explore trends in international journal articles on quality education. From the 1960s to the 2010s, the number of published articles on quality education has increased each decade. While the predominance of the input-output approach
has continued, our analysis shows that the conceptualization of quality education has diversified since 1960. The human rights approach in quality education studies has steadily increased since 2000, although rarely do studies address the postcolonial approach. Moreover, research embracing the social justice approach noticeably increased in the 2010s. While further rigorous studies are required to analyze why the way we address quality education has changed, we conclude that it has been influenced by diversified multilateralism in the education sector and the varying roles education plays in the changing paradigm of international development.